National and international energy markets are experiencing historic upheavals that will only be accelerated by next week's presidential and congressional elections.
The explosion in oil prices that peaked in July has already had a lagged but substantial effect on consumer behavior. People are driving less, adjusting preferences on what kind of cars they buy and, in some cases, where they live. Even if prices remain well below the peak, history suggests it will take several years for the effects of the energy shock to wear off. Less recognized, the Congress last year passed the most substantive package of energy legislation since at least 1980. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 mandates a 40 percent improvement in the fuel efficiency of passenger vehicles by 2020, robust new requirements for biofuels (not just corn-based ethanol), and big improvements in the efficiency of appliances and lighting. By 2015, the purchase of the venerable but inefficient incandescent light bulb will be virtually illegal. Those are tough measures, and they passed by wide margins. Now we have the most closely watched presidential election in recent memory. Never before, even during the elections following the Arab oil embargo of the 1970s, have the two candidates talked so much about energy. Their plans (available on their Web sites) promise an end to business as usual. Sen. Obama calls, for instance, for an 80 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050; McCain sets his target at 60 percent. Both goals are daunting, since they use a 1990 baseline, since which emissions have risen 20 percent. The congressional elections look like they will bring in a new crop of members eager to reduce reliance on Persian Gulf oil and slow global warming. With the long-time prestige of "unfettered markets" in disarray due to the financial meltdown, the door is open for prudent government intervention. These trends will inevitably reduce reliance on fossil fuels and promote growing roles for energy efficiency and alternatives forms of energy. Through decades of neglect, however, the United States has lost its leadership in many vital technologies that produce energy without emitting carbon dioxide, ranging from photovoltaic cells to nuclear power. Europe leads the world in the development of clean, very efficient diesel engines for automobiles; Japan does the same for hybrid-electric technology. Where does the U.S. get an edge in the emerging energy market?- Loading Comments...
- Loading Comments...
Recent Comments
Featured Photo Galleries
-
Toyota to Recall Hybrids World-Wide
The Wall Street Journal.
-
Stocks Rally on Hopes of Greek Bailout
New York Times
-
Swiss bank UBS returns to profit
BBC
-
China's Auto Sales Rise Sharply
The Wall Street Journal.
-
Guardian Media Group offloads regional newspaper arm
Latest Business News from Times Online
-
Japan Airlines Decides to Stick With American Airlines
New York Times
-
What SAP Needs After Apotheker
BusinessWeek Online
-
Why fret about Greece?
The Economist
-
Stiglitz Sees No Greek Default as ‘Speculative Attacks’ Persist
BusinessWeek Online
-
BLS: Few Job Openings in December
Calculated Risk
| Dow Jones | S&P 500 | NASDAQ | 10-Year Note | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,058.64 | 1,070.52 | 2,150.87 | 36.33 |
Oil *
72.02
|
|
UP
150.25
|
UP
13.78
|
UP
24.82
|
UP
0.41
|
10 Yr
3.63%
SPDR Gold
105.45
|
|
+1.52%
|
+1.30%
|
+1.17%
|
+1.14%
|
Data delayed 20 minutes |
More From TheStreet
Latest HeadlinesBrokerage Partners
Sponsored Links














